your article was supporting Dravid's decision as well as condeming
it...so which side r u on basically.....ofcourse u cant be that confused as
your article presents u...if the debate is over whether Dravid's decision
was a right or a wrong one..then my friend....i think u are expected to
take a stand and not equivocate between the 2 things...
though i cant sit and retaliate to everything u have wrote..i did find the
end part of ur article worth a second read...i think u made an important
statement by comparing between the India's winning record(overseas mainly)
wid the individual records...though i dun entirely agree to the reason u
gave for that ..but still the statement where you state about Dravid trying
to make it clear that individual....... is worth a thought.....i am
attachin your write up in quotes for reference.
"""
Now, look at India's win records -- is it even a fraction as great as the
individual records
would suggest? There, my friend, lies the problem. The obsession of
Indian players and Indian spectators with individual records. Hats
off to the person who made the declaration call. Cause in one master
stroke he made it clear that individual records are inconsequential
if they are not made to create victories.
"""""
Corruption is become so common in our country that one cannot think of life without. If you try to do all things without offering a bribe, i think you will waste a lot of time in your life getting things done. So corrupt people make life go faster. So, if people are corrupt, politicians will definately have to be and that will help india go ahead faster.
Hello Mate
Just remember one thing......
Out of Saurav's 6 wins, Overseas, that is , It so happened that India went on to lose the Next test playing dismally.
REMEMBER ZIMBABWE in ZIMBWE - 2001 - HARARE aFTER BULAWAYO
SRI LANKA in SRI LANKA - 2001 - COLOMBO after KANDY
and
WEST INDIES in WEST INDIES - 2002 - BARBADOS after tRINIDAD
So, Lets Keep our fingers crossed and Boy, India will be the ones who need to motivate themselves to score points at MELBOURNE And SEal The KANGARROOOS FATE>
Gandhi had a very good philosophy which is very easy to follow. Definately if we do follow it we will be living in better, peacefull and happier world. It is very good that you are feeling guilty, try to respond in a better way next time to your roomie
There was a phase in the Indian Cricket history where in WE had started getting into the mode of not depending on SACHIN - Year 2001 - 02. No wonder we started being called TEAM INDIA
But I am afraid, 2003 has entirely been back to sqaure one.
Be it the WORLD Cup - SACHIN SMassgewd 671 runs in 11 games at 66.00 Average and then again in this series - 446 in 7 matches at 77.7 Average.
Only difference, In the World Cup All the other stalwarts played, KAIF, YUVI and DRAVID Not forgetting the GANGULY FActoer. Here no one else did......
That was the diference in the TVS CUP.
If you ask me, The turning point in the AMtch was the dismissal of RAHUL dRAVID More so cause he played a selfish shot, - Looking for his 50 rather than spend time in the middle ..... Though I Must confess, If DRAVID WAs around, I Wonder whether AGARKAR Would have played those flamboyant shotrs.,
The Actual Miniscule of fragnance for Ponting's Men in the FINAL THough is undoubtedly, at the score of 99 when SACHIN GAve it away quite rightly pointed by you as an absolutely dismal shot.,
But Then, How foolish it is for us to keep cursing TENDULKLAR WEvery time when in reality, both in the WORLD CUp as well as the TVS Cup, without him, we were like Fish ourt of water.
I Totally agreee with IMRAN That SACHIN Is Not a Mathc Winner But with a pinch of sALT., SACHIN is Not a Match WINNER When INDIA BATS SECOND......... SAve the century winner at SHARJAH Some Summers back in 1998 on his 25th Birthday.
Nevertheless, Dont be surprised that India will spring a couple of surprises down under when we play the VB SEries........ More so cause we least expect them to do so,.
So Chill and have Britannia Snax.....
Cause At the End of the Tunnel, There is always Light......
Agree with you hundred percent that love is blind. Lovers have given their lives if they are not able to unite and stay together. But I purely feel that love is just a feeling that can overcome if properly controlled and thus prevent it from being blind. We should always keep a check on any relationship involving love, i.e where it is heading and what changes need to be done so that this can be controlled. A no. of factors can be used to control such feelings like the frequency of meetings.
Is India a Christian Country?
India is not a Christain country but a secular and democratic country. Ms.Sonia Gandhi is the Prime Minister of our country. She has been chosen by the single largest party in the Lok Sabha, so she has all the rights to appoint whom she wishes at different posts. So if you want to challenge her decisions it can be done during the next general elections by bringing into majority a party other than the congress i
Block this user | Report AbuseReply